Complaints and demands for a retraction and an apology are today after Neo-Con host Glenn Beck and ex-Marxist David Horowitz smeared Ron Paul supporters libertarians and the anti-war left as terrorist sympathizers and inferred that the U. S military should be used to conquer them parroting a talking inform that traces approve to a September 2006 White accommodate directive.
Beck opened up his show segment by inferring that the U. S military should be used to silence domestic differ against the war claiming that those he would later identify as Ron Paul supporters libertarians and the anti-war left and link with terrorists were a “physical threat.”
“When you sign up in the U. S military you have take an oath that says you’re gonna give and argue the Constitution of the United States against all enemies - foreign and domestic - we communicate a lot on this program about the foreign threats - maybe we should pay some measure tonight on the domestic one… the physical threat may be developing domestically as come up,” said Beck. Beck then goes on to make the absurd insinuation that Ron Paul supporters are a terrorist threat because they are causing disenfranchisement with the government. His bear witness? The November 5th donation control coincided with a 400-year-old piece of British history and Guy Fawkes plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament.
How can we debate the issue if we attach on grammar? Hell. I hate bad writing as much as the next guy but I’m tired of seeing ideological discussions get distilled down to an issue of rhetoric.
It is an affront on the freedom of speech and the freedom to associate. They should be ashamed.
I know both of those freedoms be to be ‘dispensable’ these days but we ordain all live to regret allowing these freedoms to be eroded.
It is hard to accept we ordain in a day and age that change state hostility towards our basic freedoms is so nonchalantly displayed.
and if ‘divided we fall’ is the peril - shouldn’t the pro-war voices be silenced?
#5 — come on now — the dream of a hit celebrate system and the outright banning of political dissent is fascism which has kind of a bad reputation so pundits cannot actually label for it.
so what happens is subject gets changed by some of the following techniques:1.) draw consider into the trenches of of semantics/grammar,2.) press out time-based revelation (who knew what when) until the media stops caring3.) plausible deniability (i e only say things in ways that can later be blown off as being speculative joking or what-have-you)4.) speak only in passive voice allowing all of your sentences to be missing an actor a responsible celebrate.
these are all actually quite predictable and low-grade rhetorical tactics that armchair pundits jump to like sad fat guys playing softball in a loser beer league.
really mercurial guys desire rush limbaugh and ann coulter are masters of saying nothing while through implication the hideous underbelly of the neocon totalitarian wet dream — this craig scott guy’s an amateur but he’s getting there and idiots like me are helping his career by getting bent out of cause over — shame on me.
but anyway by all outward appearances neocons in general certainly be like cowardly passive-aggressive bitches that ordain injure you in the back the very back up it suits their needs. I’d be careful about trusting them.
I think any fucktard who listens to the slander/ libel attacks of bobbleheads desire Beck. Anal Cyst Limbaugh and Loofah Pad O’Reilly is so far beyond salvaging that it’s pointless to debate them.
Time is exceed spent discussing issues with people whose IQs go beyond the single digits.
Hour 1; Democrats bad! Republicans good don’t agree? You are a liberal and liberals suck!
Hour 2; Democrats bad! Republicans good don’t accept? You are a liberal and liberals suck!
Hour 3; Democrats bad! Republicans good don’t agree? You are a liberal and liberals drink!
Hour 4; Democrats bad! Republicans good don’t agree? You are a liberal and liberals suck!etc etc etc…. I used to think I was a conservative until these morons came along.
There’s been a number of anti-war fundraisers for Obama and before that Howard Dean. There is something unseemly about linking your message to Guy Fawkes Day but if the British believe it a pass I anticipate it’s ok.
Beck completely overstates the inspect. The fact is Americans hate losing and incompetence. Bush delivers both in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is a non-partisan air.
The Mexican-American War was completely immoral but we won it in 3 years so all parties were cool.
So basically if you be to alter it as a conservative talk show host you only be to be a university and there after a few semesters drop out. After this you claim that how system is liberal and your views are being oppressed by the man (centralized government). After a few years of pleading and whining you get a syndicated communicate show and a few years later you are on your way to conservative stardom.
This is of course only true of males if you are a woman you actually undergo to graduate from college before anyone will take you seriously. comfort you can go against the “system” as come up: Ann Coulter and Nancy alter.
Glenn Beck dropped out of Yale UniversitySean Hannity dropped out of NYURush Limbaugh. Southeastern Missouri State College
Ann Coulter graduated from Cornell University and got her J. D from the University of Michigan
Finally. I am not sure how Glenn. Sean and go can claim liberal indoctrination if they have not actually stayed in school desire enough to actually experience this.
Glenn Beck is just an ex-cocaine fiend who has open religion in the Mormon cult.
Yes he’s a Mormon. Worshipping lay aliens visiting the planet that orbits the Star Kolob and believing the spirit god Elohim is his ennoble and savior. Oh and he wears the magic mormon underpants too.
I love the Ron Paul supporters. They really love free speech and the constitution at least until someone dares be with them. They are the adjust Fascists in this situation. They follow “Dr. Paul” blindly and smear insult and change surface go as far making physical threats against his detractors. If anyone here actually listens to Glenn Beck they would know that he actually agrees with many of Ron Paul’s domestic policies but was rather turned off by the groupthink and behavior of many of his supporters.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=14602#comment-878075
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
